CIU Logo
 
2020-based Population Projection Results
Demographic Update
September 2021
 
 
 
 
Executive Summary

The 2020-based population projections comprise both variant trend projections and housing-led scenario projections. This report provides a summary of the range of projected population for London and the London Boroughs.

The 2020-based projections include two types of projection: trend projections based on the continuation of past trends in population change and housing-led projections which incorporate considerations of future housing delivery into the the projection process.

Trend projections are most appropriate for strategic planning at the regional level while for most other uses the GLA recommends the use of housing-led projections.

Trend projections

The 2020-based trend projections include four main variants: 2 projections which bound a Central Range, and two which bound a wider range. The Central Range represents the range within which future population is likely to fall while the wider range represents more significant but still plausible future population change. The difference between the variants is in the assumptions about future migration behaviour, both international and domestic migration.

Housing-led projections

The 2020-based housing-led projections include three scenario projections based on different levels of future housing availability. They are the Identified Capacity scenario scenario which uses data adapted from the Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA), the Past Delivery scenario which assumes average of delivery over the last eight years will continue, and the Housing Targets scenario in which the London Plan target of 52,287 units is delivered in each year of the projection. In producing the projections no assumption has been made about the likelihood of these delivery scenarios coming forward - the projections are designed to illustrate how the population might change under the conditions described in the scenarios.

Due to limited information about potential development sites in the very long term, the housing-led projections have a projection horizon of 2041.

1 Introduction

Back to top

GLA Demography produces a range of population projections which are used to help inform planning and policy work within the GLA and across London. Projections are updated annually, incorporating the latest data as it becomes available.

The two main types of population projection produced are trend-based projections, which are based on a cohort component model that uses past trends in births, deaths and migration to project future populations, and housing-led projections, which reconcile future population growth with forecast housing supply.

This summary document outlines the results of the GLA’s 2020-based population and household projections which were released in September 2021.

The 2020-based projections take as their starting point the most recent ONS Mid-Year Estimate (mid-2020). The trend projections comprise a set of variants based on different assumptions about future migration levels. The housing-led projections include a set of scenarios in which the migration assumptions are constant but the levels of housing delivery in London differ. The production of these variants and scenarios has been driven by the desire to meet the needs of a wide range of users.

In producing the projections no assumptions have been made about the likelihood of these migration variants or housing delivery scenarios coming forward - the projections are designed to illustrate how the population might change under the conditions described in the variants/scenarios.

Detailed methodology documents are provided alongside each set of population projections which can help users decide which set of population projections is most appropriate for their needs.

2 Trend projections

Back to top

Four principal variant projections have been produced using different assumptions about future levels of domestic and international migration, they are:

The projections move forward from a starting point of mid-2020. The two years of the projection to mid-2022 are the same across all variants and reflect assumptions about short-term impacts of the pandemic and Brexit. From 2022 the projections begin to diverge as the differing longer-term migration assumptions are applied. These assumptions have been developed with the assistance of an Expert Panel of academics and professional demographers (see below).

Variant projections have been produced in order to assist users in understanding current uncertainty about future population growth. In addition to the four principal variants presented here, five additional variants were produced during the development of the 2020-based projections. Data for all variants has been published to the London Datastore.

Corresponding household projections have been run for each population output. Two sets of household projections are available for each trend variant: one set using the ONS 2018-based household model and one set using the 2014-based DCLG household model.

Projection outputs and associated documentation are available on the London Datastore.

3 Expert Panel

Back to top

In setting the assumptions for the 2019-based projections (November 2020) the GLA sought the guidance of an expert panel of academics and professional demographers. The panel were consulted on the economic and social drivers of population change in both the short-term and long-term, as well as the specifics of component trajectories. Their input was key in shaping the assumptions which formed the 2019-based variant projections.

The same panel of experts was consulted for the 2020-based projections. Their input was helpful in setting the migration assumptions and confirming the general approach taken in the production of this round of projections. A summary of the consultation responses and the recommendations arising is available on the London Datastore..

4 Interpreting variant projections

Back to top

The 2020-based variant projections provide users with several population growth trajectories. The Central Range provides a conservative view on future change in which past trends largely hold into the future. The High and Low Population variants are intended to provide a wider, but still plausible, range of possible trajectories based on significant shifts in future migration behaviour away from past trends.

4.1 Central Range

The two projections bounding the Central Range each use the same assumptions about international migration based on an average of ten years’ observed data. Net international migration to London over the past 20 years has remained relatively stable within a range of 69,200 and 126,400. The ten-year average (2010-2019) used in the modelling is 95,500 persons. More recent data are excluded from the averaging due to concerns about how ONS have distributed recent estimates of international migration. More details on this can be found in the trend model methodology documentation (see below).

The last two decades have seen a number of shocks which might be expected to have significantly impacted international flows: EU expansion in 2004, 2007 and 2013; the credit crunch, housing crisis and great recession beginning in 2008; the EU referendum in 2016; and major changes to UK migration policy throughout the period. However, absolute levels of international migration have been relatively stable, lending weight to the idea of the resilience of long-term trends.

The difference in the Upper and Lower bound projections of the Central Range is in the assumptions about future rates of domestic migration. The Upper bound uses a ten-year average (2011-2020) of past migration patterns, while the Lower bound uses a five-year average (2016-2020).

The ten-year average captures a wide range of behaviours across the economic cycle, including the lower levels of mobility observed following the financial crisis. The five-year average provides a higher migration scenario - the last five years have been a period of relatively high migration with a peak in 2017 when net out from London migration reached 101,600 people. This represents an assumption that recent levels become the norm even after accounting for potential variation over the economic cycle.

The inclusion of the year to mid-2020 in the averaging was carefully considered. Although the data for the year to mid-2020 does include some impacts of COVID-19 on population movement, they are appear to be modest. As noted by ONS in their 2020 mid-year estimate release, the significant student migration which occurs largely in September and October would have been completed well before the pandemic struck.

The Central Upper projection projects annualised growth of 59,700 per year over the period to 2050 while the Central Lower projects 45,900.

4.2 Low Population variant

The Low Population variant provides an indication of how London’s population might change in response to a sustained reduction in international migration while holding domestic net migration at relatively high levels.

This variant assumes a level of net international migration substantially below that observed over the last 20 years for the duration of the projection. Such a scenario might be consistent with a decline in the attractiveness of the UK as a destination for international migrants and/or a shift to more restrictive migration policies.

Domestic migration rates in the Low Population variant are held at the ten-year average. These domestic migration rates can be considered relatively high in the context of lower levels of international migration. Total net migration (the sum of international net and domestic net migration) in this variant ranges between -158 thousand and 26 thousand per year meaning growth in the population is largely the result of natural change rather than migration.

Annualised growth over the 30-year projection period 2021-2050 is 21,400 persons per year in the Low Population variant. This is in the context of average growth of 94,100 in London over the last decade.

4.3 High Population variant

The Expert Panel were consulted on the range of projection variants. Overall, the Panel considered that future population growth in London will likely not be as strong as it has been in recent decades. This is in part because recent growth has been so strong and in part because of the wider impacts on future growth of recent shocks associated with the pandemic and Brexit. However, there remains good reason to include a High Population variant in the 2020-based projections.

London receives a significant share of UK immigration and in particular a large share of incoming high-skilled workers. As a result, there exists the potential for the capital’s level of in-migration to remain steady, or even grow, within a wider context of falling migration to the UK as a whole. In addition, during the most recent financial crisis London’s relative global strength saw it become more attractive internationally, leading to growth during a period of high economic uncertainty and recession. An important element of this is the international student market which remains strong and where growth is expected to continue.

The resilience of long-term trends across very different social and economic conditions has enabled London’s population to grow consistently over the last two decades at an average of 88,000 persons per year. A projection variant providing a trajectory above the Central Range is considered necessary to account for the possibility of sustained growth over the projection period in spite of current conditions. The High Population variant projects average annual growth of 84,500 persons per year.

Domestic migration patterns in the High Population variant are based on an average of the last ten years’ rates. As domestic outflows from London have tended to rise in line with international inflows, these rates can be considered as relatively low in the context of the higher international migration flows assumed in this variant.

The High Population variant is the only projection which has positive net migration (the sum of domestic and international flows) for the entire projection period. Total net migration peaks at 43 thousand persons before falling to 2 thousand at the end of the projection.

4.4 Supplementary variants

Alongside the four main variants the GLA has published an additional five supplementary variants for use in sensitivity analysis. The full range of projections outputs is available on the London Datastore.

4.5 Projections for areas outside London

The detailed variant projections outputs include data for all local authorities in England and Wales as well as national-level data for Northern Ireland and Scotland. This report presents the results for London only. Data for areas beyond the Greater London boundary are primarily published for the purpose of transparency and do not necessarily reflect the organisation’s view of future growth outside of the city.

5 Methodology

Back to top

A paper on the model and methodology used to produce these projections is available to download from the London Datastore: https://data.london.gov.uk/demography/population-and-household-projections/

6 Mid-year estimate adjustment

Back to top

The GLA has previously identified what we believe to be a systematic over-estimation in the level of net migration of young people in London resulting primarily from an imbalance in the way that age structures are applied to international inflows and outflows are in the ONS mid-year estimates. To mitigate this issue, we have adjusted the mid-year estimate series from 2011-2020 so that in 2020 there are 103 thousand fewer children in the ages 0-10. This population has been redistributed to the ages 18-28 so that the total population for London and the boroughs remains the same, albeit with an amended age structure. More details on this can be found in the methodology documentation on the London Datastore.

7 Trend projections Results

Back to top

7.1 Projections in the Short-term

The initial short-term period of the projections (up to 2025) accounts for the on-going impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and Brexit on London’s population. Assumptions about migration patterns during the first two years of all variants are consistent. Over the following two years (2023-2024) migration assumptions diverge as levels of both international and domestic migration transition incrementally towards the long-term values set for each variant. These long-term levels come into effect in 2025.

The impacts on population of these short-term migration assumptions, along with the increase in mortality from COVID-19 can be seen in Figure 1. The population in the 2020 base year for London is 9.002 million. This falls by 107 thousand over the year to 2021. Then, from a low of 8.895 million in 2021 the population begins to grow again as migration pattern reach their long-term levels.

7.2 Long-term projections

Beyond 2025, long-term levels of migration are reached and maintained.

In the Central Range, international migration returns to the 10-year average (net 95,500) while in the Low Population variant international migration is 50 thousand per year and in the High Population variant 125,000 per year.

A 10-year average of domestic migration rates is used in all but the Central Low variant where a high net out migration scenario is used.

All four variants project population growth over the period, albeit to varying levels. London grew by 1 million people in both of the last two decades. Over the decade to 2030, the High Population variant sees growth of 834 thousand while the in Low Population variant London is projected to grow by 315 thousand. Growth over the entire projection period to 2050 ranges between 1.377 million and million in the Central Range, and 641 thousand and 2.535 million in the wider range.

Table 1: Variant population projections, London
Source: GLA 2020-based population projections

7.3 Comparison to 2019-based

The 2019-based GLA trend projections were released in November 2020. The methodological differences between the last round and the 2020-based projections are primarily that:

  • the 2020-based projections include an extra year of data, and;
  • migration assumptions in the short-term have been adjusted to incorporate recent intelligence and data on the impact of COVID-19 on migration flows.

The 2020-based projections provide a lower growth trajectory outlook than the 2019-based projections. In the 2019-based projections the Central Range of population in 2050 was 10.516 to 10.915 million, while in 2020 that growth has been revised to between 10.272 and .

This is the result of the inclusion of a more severe shock to the population in the short-term as well as a lower mid-year starting point in 2020. In the 2020-based projection the recovery to long-term trends happens faster - by 2025 rather than 2028. This revision is based on th advice of the Expert Panel and analysis of Home Office visa issuances data which indicate a ‘bounce back’ of international flows is likely to have already begun.

8 Age structure

The age structure in 2036, after 15 years of projected change, is shown in the chart below. Age structure has implications for household growth trajectories (see the section on households below) where household formation rates differ by age.

The Low Population variant is based on assumptions of a high net migration outflow. Because the young adult population is most at most at risk of migration a high net migration variant has a much lower population among the young adults (20-40 years old). The converse is the High Population variant which assumes low net out migration meaning the young adult population swells. In older ages there is much less propensity for migration and so the difference between the variants is less.

ADD 2020 TO CHART - SEE IF IT WORKS

9 Working age population

The size of working age population in London is heavily dependent on the level of migration. High net out migration as seen in the Low Population variant leads to a decline in the working age population over time. In the High Population variant, which has a low net out migration, the population grows over the period to 2050.

The Central Range projects growth up to 2040 and then a leveling-off/slight decline in the last decade of the projections.

10 Components of Change

Back to top

Births, deaths and migration all contribute to London’s changing population. Natural change, which is the difference between the number of births and deaths, is the largest direct contributor to London’s population growth. Natural change is comparatively high in London because its age structure is much younger than that of the rest of the UK.

As noted above, London’s relatively youthful population is a result of established patterns of migration to and from the capital, which give rise to a net inflow of young adults and a net outflow of all other age groups.

10.1 Total migration

Total net migration is the sum of all flows into and out of an area. This includes both international and domestic flows. Historically, London has seen large gross flows both in and out of the capital which have largely cancelled each other out. Over the last decade total net migration has ranged between -34 thousand and 63 thousand.

10.2 International migration

International migration assumptions provide the basis for much of the variation between the four projection variants. There are three international migration scenarios: a high, a central, and a low. In each case the level of net migration was agreed in consultation with the Expert Panel before gross in and out flows consistent with those net assumptions were derived.

Net international migration in the high scenario is 125,000 persons per annum, in the central scenario is 95,500 persons per annum and in the low scenario is 50,000 persons per annum. These levels are achieved in 2025 in the modelling. The period 2020-2022 has its own international migration profile which is consistent across all three scenarios. The period 2023-2024 is a transition period over which levels of migration move from the 2022 level to the 2025 level.

10.3 Domestic migration

The variant projections use a high migration scenario for the Central Lower projection and a central migration scenario for the other three variants As domestic migration is projected using a rates-based approach, the number of people moving in any given projection is a function of the size and structure of the resident population as well as the rates.

The balance of domestic migration in London has been consistently negative for the last two decades. This means that more people leave the capital each year for other areas of the UK than move to London. Higher rates of domestic migration overall lead to a higher net outflow from London and correspondingly slower population growth.

The Central Lower variant uses a high domestic migration average and as a result has the highest outflow of the four variants. The other three variants use the same central scenario migration rates – the differences in levels here are a result of the size of the resident population to which the rates are applied.

10.4 Births

Births are calculated in the variant projections using the same set of fertility rates. Differences in the number of births in the variants are a result of the differing resident populations.

Annual births in London rose by approximately 30 per cent over the decade from 2002 to 2012. Since then the number of births has fallen and in 2020 115,700, similar to the level seen in 2005.

The same fertility rates are applied in each of the variants. The difference in births is a function of the differing size and composition of the population in each projection. In all cases an initial period of falling births is followed by steady increase. The number of births peaks and stabilises at the end of the projection as the number of women of child-bearing age in the population reaches an equilibrium.

10.5 Deaths

The same mortality rates are applied in each of the variants. Differences in the number of deaths in the variants are a result of the differing resident populations.

The impact of COVID-19 can be seen in the deaths occurring in 2020 and 2021. From 2022 on wards deaths from COVID-19 are assumed to be accounted for by the normal application of mortality rates.

10.6 Natural change

Natural change is the balance of births and deaths over the year. It is the largest direct contributor to London’s growth.

11 Household projections

Back to top

For each population projection variant, household projections have been run using adapted versions of the ONS 2018-based household projection model and the 2014-based DCLG household model.

11.1 ONS Household projections

The ONS model is the official household model for England and was used by ONS in the preparation of the 2018-based household projections.

Table 2: Variant household projections (ONS household model), London
Source: GLA 2020-based projections, ONS 2018-based household model
Table 3: Annualised household change (ONS household model)
Source: GLA 2020-based projections, ONS 2014-based household model

11.2 DCLG Household projections

The DCLG model was the official household model for England for the preparation of the 2014-based household projections. Outputs from this model remain relevant due to its continued use by MHCLG in the preparation of housing targets.

Table 4: Variant household projections (DCLG household model), London
Source: GLA 2020-based projections, DCLG 2014-based household model
Table 5: Annualised household change (DCLG household model)
Source: GLA 2020-based projections, DCLG 2014-based household model

12 Housing-led projections

Back to top

The housing-led projections are produced for London boroughs, wards and MSOAs. The GLA suggests that these projections provide the best estimate of future populations at these geographic resolutions. This is because the additional intelligence on the capacity of smaller areas to accommodate population, in the form of available housing stock, provides a more realistic view of future population. The GLA recommends the housing-led projections for most purposes.

Unlike the trend projections which have a projection horizon of 2050, the housing-led projections work to a projection horizon of 2041. This is because the availability, reliability and utility of housing delivery data diminishes over time.

The 2020-based housing-led projections comprise three scenario projections each of which uses a different housing delivery trajectory.

12.1 Identified Capacity Scenario

Back to top

This scenario adapts the 2017 Strategic Housing Land Availability Assessment (SHLAA) housing capacity study for use as a future delivery scenario. A SHLAA is a technical exercise to determine the quantity and suitability of land potentially available for housing development. It is a required part of the evidence base needed for the preparation of a Local Plan.

In the initial years of the projection the delivery assumptions have been amended to reflect housing market analysis undertaken by Savills Estate Agents. In 2020 assumed delivery is 41,700 while for 2021-2025 it is 43,000 per annum. The total delivery over this period is 256,700 while the SHLAA capacity identifies 333,100 units over the same period. The difference (76,400) is assumed to come forward over the period 2026-2041 and is distributed to the trajectory for those years.

In later years the trajectory assumes lower levels of delivery. Whilst this is unlikely to be a reality for London’s future growth, it is a reflection that the SHLAA, on which this delivery scenario is based, is a capacity study that - due to information available on site availability and deliverability at the time - is better able to identify sites in the short-to-medium term. In the longer-term SHLAA capacity is based on less reliable assumptions about sites that may come forward for housing delivery. This is due to an inability to predict market changes or development patterns that could result in brownfield land not currently suitable for housing becoming available. As a result, annual delivery in later years is much lower than the initial years of the trajectory, however in reality this is unlikely to occur.

In the Identified Capacity scenario the number of dwellings in London is forecast increase by 788 thousand over the 21-year period to 2041. This is an increase of 21.6% over current stocks.

12.2 Past Delivery Scenario

Back to top

This scenario assumes that the average of past levels of development, as reported in the London Development Database (LDD) will come forward each year for the period 2022-2041.

In the initial years of the projection, the level of delivery is assumed to be the same as in the Identified Capacity scenario: 41,700 in 2020 and 43,000 in 2021. The underlying assumption being that this recently developed intelligence on short-term delivery, undertaken in 2021 during the pandemic, provides the most reasonable estimate of short-term delivery. Beyond 2021, the LDD average of 31,100 units is used.

In this scenario, the number of dwellings is forecast increase by 664 thousand over the 21-year period to 2041. This is an increase of 18.2% over current stocks.

12.3 Housing Targets Scenario

Back to top

This scenario assumes that the London Plan target of 52,300 dwellings will be delivered in each year of the projection period up to 2041. In the initial years of the projection, the level of delivery is assumed to be the same as in the Identified Capacity scenario: 41,700 in 2020 and 43,000 in 2021. The underlying assumption being that this recently developed intelligence on short-term delivery, undertaken in 2021 during the pandemic, provides the most reasonable estimate of short-term delivery.

In the Housing Targets scenario, the number of dwellings is forecast increase by 1.089 million over the 21-year period to 2041. This is an increase of 29.8% over current stocks.

12.4 Development Trajectories

12.4.1 Assumed development

The chart shows the net additional dwellings assumed in each year of the projection for the three scenarios. Data for 2012-2019 are taken from the LDD.

12.4.2 Assumed stock

The chart shows the cumulative growth in units over the projection period in each of the three scenarios.

13 Housing-led projections Results

Back to top

This section provides a brief overview of the 2020-based housing-led projections at the London level.

13.1 Comparison to the Trend

The chart shows the 2020-based trend projections Central Range in grey alongside the three housing-led scenarios population trajectories. Note that the migration assumptions in the housing-led scenarios are consistent with the lower bound of the Central Range. This effectively means that differences between the housing-led lines and the lower bound of the Central Range are a result of differences in housing capacity, as applied in the modelling.

Table 6: Housing-led population projections, London
Source: GLA 2020-based population projections

13.2 Population change

Back to top

The housing-led projections are recommended for most uses, especially those at borough level. The maps below show the spatial distribution of growth over the projection period 2020-2041 in each of the three scenarios. WOULD THESE BE BETTER AS WARD MAPS?

13.2.1 Identified Capacity

Map 1: Population growth 2020-2041, Identified Capacity Scenario
Source: GLA 2020-based population projections

13.2.2 Past Delivery

Map 2: Population growth 2020-2041, Past Delivery Average Scenario
Source: GLA 2020-based population projections

13.2.3 Housing Targets

Map 3: Population growth 2020-2041, Housing Targets Scenario
Source: GLA 2020-based population projections

13.3 Age structure

Back to top

As with the trend projections, differences in the age structure between the scenarios in the housing-led projections are the result of different levels of migration. The Housing Targets scenario has the highest level of housing delivery meaning that there is comparatively higher net in-migration in this scenario. This not only raises the total population but impacts the age structure so that there is more population in young adults of working age. In older ages there is less differentiation between the scenarios.

13.4 Average Household Size

Back to top

Average Household Size (AHS) is calculated by dividing the household population of an area by the number of households. These levels of AHS are adjusted in the model to account for past trends in population change and the amount of available housing. The results can be seen in the chart below. The Past Delivery scenario has lower housing delivery meaning population must fit into fewer households and thus raising AHS compared to the other scenarios.

13.5 Ward profiles

Back to top

Housing-led projections are produced for London wards and MSOAs as well as Boroughs. Due to data limitations and a reliance on census inputs the projections use 2013 ward boundaries and ward-level projections are not currently available for ward boundaries which have come into effect since 2013. A ward-level summary of the housing-led scenario projections is available through the London Datastore.

 
 
 
For more information please contact the Demography Team, GLA City Intelligence Unit.
demography@london.gov.uk
 
Copyright © Greater London Authority, 2021